Reiniging en desinfectie van ruimten Module 1b Risk-of-bias-tabel
| Author, year |
Selection of participants Was selection of exposed and non-exposed cohorts drawn from the same population? |
Exposure Can we be confident in the assessment of exposure? |
Outcome of interest Can we be confident that the outcome of interest was not present at start of study? |
Confounding-assessment Can we be confident in the assessment of confounding factors? |
Confounding-analysis Did the study match exposed and unexposed for all variables that are associated with the outcome of interest or did the statistical analysis adjust for these confounding variables? |
Assessment of outcome Can we be confident in the assessment of outcome? |
Follow up Was the follow up of cohorts adequate? In particular, was outcome data complete or imputed? |
Co-interventions Were co-interventions similar between groups? |
Overall Risk of bias |
| Definitely yes, probably yes, probably no, definitely no | Definitely yes, probably yes, probably no, definitely no | Definitely yes, probably yes, probably no, definitely no | Definitely yes, probably yes, probably no, definitely no | Definitely yes, probably yes, probably no, definitely no | Definitely yes, probably yes, probably no, definitely no | Definitely yes, probably yes, probably no, definitely no | Definitely yes, probably yes, probably no, definitely no | Low, some concerns, high | |
| Diab-Elschahawi (2010) |
Definitely yes Reason: similar test areas were used for intervention and control. |
Definitely yes Reason: Micro­organisms were applied similar on all test areas. |
Definitely yes Reason: similar quantities of microorganism were applied on test areas. |
Definitely yes Reason: wiping was performed similar in all experiments. |
Not applicable |
Definitely yes Reason: quantative outcome measures were used. |
Not applicable | Not applicable | Low |
| Hron (2019) |
Definitely yes Reason: similar test areas were used for intervention and control. |
Definitely yes Reason: Micro­organisms and hydrophobic residue were applied similar on all test areas. |
Definitely yes Reason: similar quantities of microorganism and hydrophobic residue were applied on test areas. |
Definitely yes Reason: wiping was performed similar in all experiments. |
Not applicable |
Definitely yes Reason: quantative outcome measures were used. |
Not applicable | Not applicable | Low |
| Trajtman (2015) |
Definitely yes Reason: similar test areas were used for intervention and control. |
Definitely yes Reason: Microorganisms were applied similar on all test areas. |
Definitely yes Reason: similar quantities of microorganism were applied on test areas. |
Definitely yes Reason: wiping was performed similar in all experiments. |
Not applicable |
Definitely yes Reason: quantative outcome measures were used. |
Not applicable | Not applicable | Low |
| Wiemken (2014) |
Definitely yes Reason: similar test areas were used for intervention and control. |
Definitely yes Reason: Microorganisms were applied similar on all test areas. |
Definitely yes Reason: similar quantities of microorganism were applied on test areas. |
Definitely yes Reason: wiping was performed similar in all experiments. |
Not applicable |
Definitely yes Reason: quantative outcome measures were used. |
Not applicable | Not applicable | Low |
| Wren (2008) |
Definitely yes Reason: similar test areas were used for intervention and control. |
Definitely yes Reason: Microorganisms were applied similar on all test areas. |
Definitely yes Reason: similar quantities of microorganism were applied on test areas. |
Definitely yes Reason: wiping was performed similar in all experiments. |
Not applicable |
Definitely yes Reason: quantative outcome measures were used. |
Not applicable | Not applicable | Low |